• Prethoryn Overmind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I use both Mastodon and BlueSky and I don’t really care for platforms like Twitter. Both Mastodon and BlueSky are good in their own ways but I think BlueSky is user friendly. Easy to setup looks super similar to Twitter, easier to navigate.

    Plus, I have heard about it pretty much everywhere. It is commonly compared to Threads. I only know and heard about Mastodon on Lemmy.

  • recapitated@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I signed up, out of curiosity but I don’t have any friends there that I know about. Kinda like Lemmy, but Lemmy but works great for not having friends.

    • Prethoryn Overmind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I am always a little surprised that everyone is surprised as if people are intentionally avoiding Mastodon.

      I like Mastodon but it is empty by comparison to BlueSky people want a social media app where there are people to talk to on quantities. BlueSky is also user friendly by comparison, IMO. Easier to setup.

      “Well Mastodon would be busier if people would stop going anywhere else.”

      No one is avoiding Mastodon I think it is odd it has never occurred to anyone that BlueSky is talked about way more. I had never heard Mastodon before Lemmy but I saw talks of BlueSky everywhere.

    • glowinfly@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      At least it can be bridged, and people can partially self-host. If you take a look at Mastodon and Bluesky, you’ll quickly realize the gap between Twitter-like feel between Bluesky and Mastodon, maybe a different interface that puts it more close to Twitter and mobile apps with it would help… a lot of Twitter users used it on mobile app.

  • futatorius@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    15 hours ago

    An even better alternative is to replace it with nothing. The Twitter-like messaging paradigm is only good for trivia and rumor-mongering.

        • moitoi@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Yeah but no. It’s not an RSS feed per se. It’s researchers sharing what they publish and what other publish with ints or resumes sometimes. Then people would comment and researchers reply.

          • brilokuloj@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Never went away, they’re still used by independent websites. A potential hurdle was that Firefox dropped native support at one point

            • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              …and a lot that are not that independent. I never stopped using RSS. It’s only because it’s not so easily monetized that it’s not more widely known, I bet.

    • marx2k@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      …or following people and interests you want to follow and keeping up with their updates.

      ffs stop gatekeeping social media

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        The facebook/mastadon format is much better for individuals, no? And Reddit/Lemmy for niches, as long as they’re supplemented by a wiki or something.

        And Tumblr. The way content gets spread organically, rather than with an algorithm, is actually super nice.

        IMO Twitter’s original premise, of letting novel, original, but very short thoughts fly into the ether has been so thoroughly corrupted that it can’t really come back. It’s entertaining and engaging, but an awful format for actually exchanging important information, like discord.

      • BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        If i ever wan tto know what Natalie Portman ate for breakfast, i’ll walk into the ocean

        • dezmd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Everyone knows it was hot grits, and she poured them down your pants.

          Just /. things.

  • Mwa@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    as a Bluesky / Mastodon user, Mastodon is wayyyy better.

    • priapus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Also, a Bluesky and Mastodon user, although I use Mastodon significantly more. Both have upsides and downsides. Mastodon’s onboarding experience has improved, but it’s still worse than Bluesky’s. Also, the fact that Mastodon doesn’t federate likes is honestly very strange. It makes the platform look dead at first glance, which really hurts first impressions.

      I still prefer Mastodon, federation is great and I’ve had an easier time finding people to follow there. Bluesky’s feature of following community made feeds is really cool though.

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I think that for the average Joe Mastodon looks too confusing and unpolished, compared to Bluesky.

        • priapus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Bluesky does have federation, it’s not at the level of Mastodon’s, but it’s improving. You can host a personal data server, which lets you host your account from your own server. You do still access this account through the main BlueSky website and apps, but authentication is done through your own server.

        • mke@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          Speaking of features, I’m somewhat surprised more people aren’t interested in Misskey and co., especially compared to Mastodon’s overwhelming share of the Fediverse pie.

          • Mwa@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Oh yeah true, when more people became unhappy about Twitter so they all went to bluesky and mastodon. So it makes sense.

  • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    18 hours ago

    eh it is good to leave that shit hole behind but Elon already got very high returns from his investment on Shitter (got his daddy elected) so it’s too late.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I use(d) Twitter for niche interactive hobbies that didn’t have enough people on Mastodon to engage with.

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I feel you, but Mastodon has about 9 million users and BlueSky has 15 million (if the first results from a search index are to be trusted), but I could not find anywhere even close to 60% of the people in this hobby on Mastodon as I have on BlueSky.

          There was a very concentrated push recently of artists (I think it was artists originally) to go to BlueSky and it’s sort of echoed into similarish hobbies. So that’s probably why the user makeup is a little different.

  • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve seen the effect. It’s just like after Brazil cut Twitter off. My very niche account has been gaining new followers by the hour.

    I have no idea how people interested in Heathcliff are being found by new people. Much less people interested in Heathcliff without Heathcliff.

  • lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I honestly don’t understand why people waited so I don’t use mastodon but I did cancel my Twitter account literally the first week he bought it. It wasn’t hard to see this coming and I just don’t get the delay.

    • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      I still don’t understand why people even use Twitter or mastodon or blue sky. It all just looks like a Facebook feed to me.

      • I joined bluesky a year ago to check it out. There wasn’t much happening on it at the time, so I got bored of it real quick. It was like the original version of Twitter. The day after the election, I got on X to see what kind of shit show was going on there, but my account was permanently suspended. I was just on there the day before the election with no problem. I rarely posted anything on it, but I have made some left leaning posts in the past. Like, 2 years in the past. Kinda weird to suspend my account right after the election. Whatever, I was never a big X user. So, I opened bluesky to see if it improved at all, and holy shit, it’s bopping. It’s still like old Twitter. It’s open source, no ads at all, and they make it really convenient to find accounts to follow with “starter packs”. I gotta say, I love it. There are almost no fake accounts or bots. They get weeded out pretty quick. That’s become my new Twitter, and Lemmy is my Reddit.

    • timconspicuous@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Been there for over a year now and fwiw, this wave feels more sustainable than before. In previous waves, a lot of people went back to Twitter after a week because Twitter still had “the juice” and Bluesky didn’t, but with 15 now million members and decent engagement, this is starting to turn around.

    • Jin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I was on Mastodon, but host or whatever you call it, didn’t like what I said and got banned.

      Feel like bluesky wouldn’t have that kind of power and control by one person and be more open and popular.

      • Pasta Dental@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        the problem is its easier to use because there is virtually no federation. Ive yet to see a user thats not from the flagship bsky.social instance

        • priapus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I just opened BlueSky to see how many people I followed using their own PDS instance and the fourth post in my feed was from someone using one, and the 7th was from Washington Post who also uses their own.

        • mke@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Maybe you’re already aware, but bluesky doesn’t operate with instances like in ActivityPub land.

          I’ve seen many people I believe are using their own PDS, but yes, discoverability is likely better because a relay is meant to aggregate and share all data it can (look up “bluesky firehose”).

    • nao@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 day ago

      Mastodon or Lemmy, because you would have to choose an instance and a client. Threads, because why would you?

        • pixelscript@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          1 day ago

          Choice is an irritating speed bump to people who don’t care to choose, which unfortunately is most of them.

          • priapus@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            It doesn’t need to be, as long as there is also a proper default for those who don’t care. Lemmy and Mastodon both unfortunately lacked this during the periods where they both had the most opportunity to grow.

            Nowadays Mastodon does it pretty well. Users don’t need to know anything, they just download Mastodon from the app store and register on the instance it chooses by default.

    • Nadru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I’ve been stupidly trying to convince them to use Mastodon on the same thread on reddit yesterday.

      Some prefer the interface, but I guess the real issue is what stopping them from selling it to another Musk like they did with Twitter.

    • 4grams@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Sigh, here we go again. I jumped on board because it’s where my friends are. Was pleasantly surprised that most of my old twitter follows are already there. Still, given the history I’m being careful and ready for the next enshittification exodus.

      I wish folks would just embrace self hosting and decentralization but we obviously love to make the same mistakes again, and again, and again…

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        Decentralization is a bit like showing people “Here’s how to make friends. I won’t actually introduce you to anyone, though.” I kind of want to at least get a starting point off a general topic.