• CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      In civilized countries “self defense” means you might have to punch someone. “You should have an easy way to kill someone on you at all times, and keep it hidden so they don’t know” is not self defense, but clear signs of a dystopia.

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        2 hours ago

        In civilized countries “self defense” means you might have to punch someone.

        My back is fucked and have an 80% rating from the VA. I’m not getting into fist fights anymore.

        If someone gets blown away stealing shit, the world has become a better place, frankly.

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          “Property is more valuable than human lives.”
          A statement from a person in a developed country apparently…

          • capital@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 hour ago

            “The strong should be allowed to do whatever they want to the weak” A statement from a person in a developed country apparently…

              • capital@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 minutes ago

                Uh, no. There are quite a lot of laws governing when deadly force is allowed which vary by country and state. I’m quite sure none of them allow it when someone “bothers you”.

                • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 minutes ago

                  There’s also laws governing what constitutes theft. Your entire argument about needing a gun is dependent on people not following the law.

              • capital@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                33 minutes ago

                And without one, the stronger will always prevail over the weak. I can’t believe I need to spell this out.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  31 minutes ago

                  Who is “the stronger” in a situation where you have a gun and someone else does not?

                  • capital@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    28 minutes ago

                    Me.

                    And my wife, and daughter. People that, without the use of arms, will always be the weaker given it’s usually men who commit these crimes.

                    You’re missing the point - this tool takes physical strength out of the equation for self defense purposes and you’re acting like it’s a bad thing.