• Nik282000@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Sooo, I guess Canada really just wants to get railed by a bunch of rich pricks. Even across age, education and social class the CPC is the preferred party, with the only disparity being between women and men. I am no expert on women but I can tell you for sure that most men have tribe-brain and Poilievre knows it.

    • Nogami@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I want the NDP. I don’t want diet maga lite.

      You can see how quickly their house of cards is collapsing down south. We need a smart woman to be in power here as well (of course that lets out the Alberta premiere).

      Fortunately I’m an educated male who can think critically. Nobody I know who is well educated wants CPC in power. They have no plan, they just slam others when questioned.

      • psvrh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Freeland isn’t a dummy, not by any stretch, but she’s also been Hillary’ed over the last several years and would be glass-cliff’ed if she ran. After that, the LPC bench is thin.

        The NDP has a similar problem: they’ve spent the post-Layton era chasing donation candidates (which is why get Singh instead of Angus) and their bench is thin, too.

        The CPC, curiously, as a relatively strong bench, mostly because they’re packed to the gills with backstabbing business grifters.