![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
Oh. Guess you are the exception. Good on you for escaping. Now you can give your cash, I’ll never be giving mine out to other than charities.
Oh. Guess you are the exception. Good on you for escaping. Now you can give your cash, I’ll never be giving mine out to other than charities.
And they’re not an essential service. Let them take a massive PR and financial hit for screwing up peoples travel plans by not negotiating in good faith.
Word is that when a competitor tries to pop up westjet lowers fares and adds routes to kill them off then raises back up again when they have no viable competition.
I never give out cash. It will be misused most of the time. I donate to charities or food banks instead.
Can’t stand using cash. I’d be fine with an unregulated crypto currency that doesn’t need for profit companies, but never want to carry cash again.
I took Via from Vancouver to Toronto. Was totally awesome but $$$.
Totally support the workers here. Westjet is a shitty company. Won’t be flying them in the future.
Ya I always liked them. I don’t have an AM radio in my car anymore but listed to the FM HD digital version.
Wonder if connected vehicles and phones with traffic data cut into their audience.
I liked listening to them when shit was hitting the fan though, especially if I wasn’t impacted.
When you build it yourself you get to name it. When it’s city (public) money you don’t.
Sonsorship subscriptions are fine though. I’d even suggest that a certain portion must be set aside in a fund that generates interest or investment revenue.
So salty. Pity.
lol. Enjoy your dreamland. Never going to happen.
Sure. But not in the most expensive market in Canada. Get your human right housing in the middle of Canada somewhere.
Want to see a government get voted out so fast you’d hear a sonic boom as they exited office? There you go.
Neither of what you mentioned will change. You might as well scream at the tide.
Society won’t collapse but people are gonna need to get used to living in small places. 1200-1400sqft for 2 people will be a luxury in a big city.
Single detached? Forget it.
What makes you think the government has the slightest interest in building any social housing, much less lots of it? What’s the net positive for them?
Just remember that every home and land owner will instantly vote out any government that messes with their nest egg’s value.
You could try and argue there’s more people who want cheap housing than those who already have it but it’s nowhere near enough to keep a government elected.
Which bullshit is that? Details please.
Built by who, and on what cheap land? It’s not going to be the government, any government even trying that will be voted out instantly so it will never happen because there’s no money for it.
Any private developers will be seeing it as a money making opportunity and price it accordingly.
Funny how westjet wouldn’t deal honestly in negotiations until the union put their back to the wall over a huge holiday.
They were 100% counting on the government to impose a settlement to screw over the union.