Hello everyone, I’ve been using linux on my main system for the past few years and am very happy with the results. From repurposing old family laptops to give them new life, to being able to play triple A games with little to no issues, Linux has turned into my OS of choice.
Through all of the ups and downs, learning about the different distros and desktop environments/ window managers has taught me a lot about what each distro is aiming for and how they want to achieve it.
The purpose of this post is to mainly help encourage others to make the switch. Regardless of use case, I believe that it can be done better with Linux. Don’t be discouraged by the overwhelming amount of distros out there, I can say that I have spend the first year taking Linux more seriously messing with different distros and seeing what works well.
This is a list of distros that I’ve used in chronological order and my thoughts on it:
- Ubuntu - Used as email and web machine for family members on old computers, worked fine
- Linux Mint - Looks more like Windows, seems faster than Ubuntu
- Pop OS - Used for their easy install option for my Nvidia dual gpu laptop which was a pain on anything else, worked okay
- Manjaro - Was a bit more difficult to get used to, ended up feeling buggier than Linux Mint
- Endeavouros - Slightly better than Manjaro, still had random bugs and wiki was not very helpful
- Garuda OS - Similar to last two, just reskinned
- Opensuse TW - First distro that I truly enjoy, more up to date and easy to manage
- Opensuse MicroOs - Wanted to see what the immutable distro thing was about, works fine but gets hairy if you want to install non flatpaks or give flatpaks access to system files. I definitely see the use case, just not suited for what I’m doing
- Debian - Similar to first 3 without extra customization of distro, not as up to date in some areas but the tradeoff is a much more stable less bloated environment. In my opinion its the best for a system that you want to work every time with little to no issues as long as you don’t mind missing cutting edge feature
- Arch(btw) - My current distro. Spent a whole weekend trying to install it wondering if it was worth all the time. After installation, system works great on AMD hardware and is set up for dual gpu passthrough to play nearly any game with no issues. The wiki is amazing and has helped me solve any issues that I’ve come across.
To conclude, Linux is difficult at first, but after learning more about how things interact and understanding more of what’s happening, the result is extremely stable with so much to learn and discover. I also reccomend taking the dive into more terminal based applications when possible, they have been more efficient and less buggy in my experience, although I understand not wanting to live in the terminal. In the end, it’s your system and you can customize it however you need, take the time and find out what works best for you and you will be very happy with the results.
Endeavour is arch, the arch wiki still applies.
Any issues I have with my eos install I refer to the arch wiki. And occasionally eos forums.
That is true in the same way that Ubuntu is Debian. I prefer the base version where I can choose what’s necessary for me for resource management and troubleshooting purposes. I forget what it was, but there were a few issues where Endeavouros was not working properly and the Arch wiki solutions did not work for it, could have been my error as well at the time.
No it’s not. Endeavor literally is just Arch but purple and with an installer. Ubuntu makes many changes.
Fair enough, I most likely broke the system due to not understanding it when using Endeavour. From my understanding now, someone can choose to not install de specific programs and additional endeavouros apps.