The San Francisco medical examiner's office determined Suchir Balaji's death to be suicide and police found no evidence of foul play.
  • john89@lemmy.caEnglish
    216·
    12 days ago

    It’s just speculation. I don’t know, I could be wrong, but I’d wager I’m right.

    Do you think there’s not a statistically significant amount of whistleblowers who are liars?

    • Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      121·
      11 days ago

      This, ladies and gentlemen and all those in between, is what the professionals call “talking out of your ass.”

      • john89@lemmy.caEnglish
        110·
        11 days ago

        Uhh, no. I didn’t say it was true, I said I think it would be true.

        If you equate that to “talking out of my ass” then you need to work on your reading comprehension.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.ukEnglish
      61·
      11 days ago

      I cannot possibly say but what I would say is that there is a significantly higher likelihood than what he is saying is correct. Given that you basically can prove it for yourself by simply asking the AI to quote copyrighted content, the fact that it can do that rather demonstrates that copyright content was acquired illegally, and if the copyright holders never talked to openAI, then openAI by definition never got permission.

      It’s weird that you would assume malice on everyone’s behalf by default, what would they have to gain by it?

      • john89@lemmy.caEnglish
        15·
        11 days ago

        It’s weird that you would assume malice on everyone’s behalf by default, what would they have to gain by it?

        Can you read? I never assumed malice on everyone’s behavior. I said a statistically significant amount.

    • optissima@lemmy.mlEnglish
      22·
      11 days ago

      I think there’s not enough evidence to prove that, so no. Why would you lie in the way that you’re most likely going to be killed from?