• Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Would PR have fixed this, though? Or could those votes for Mike Morrice, who worked hard for his riding and deserved another session in Parliament, simply have gone to elect some other Green in a floating seat?

    With a fixed number of seats, we can’t all get the representatives we want. Members of a party are not fungible.

    • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I don’t know for sure, but under PR, 4 or 5 “presincts” around Kitchener would be amalgamated to select 4 or 5 members of parliament from the pool. I’m not positive if Greens would need 20-25% of vote for 1 seat across all of Kitchener, but it would be the Green that got the most votes that would get the seat. Someone around here knows more than me, but I don’t know if there is a risk of party infighting if “the best they can hope for is x seats”

    • ibelieveinthehousehippo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think a lot of people would feel free to vote for the representative they truly want instead of feeling forced to vote strategically against someone they don’t want

      • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        24 hours ago

        That doesn’t really address my point. Yes, voting patterns would have been different. But lets say this is how the vote turned out.