• MunkysUnkEnz0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    The fact that they’re asking her to apologize is Just ass backwards.

    They should apologize, and look into the issue, and possibly, stop, war profiting.

    That’s okay. They’re going to lose a lot of Windows users, forcing them to upgrade Perfectly good computers.

    • SilentObserver@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 days ago

      I wish that were the case. But I doubt most people will ditch Windows. They’ll just pony up for a new computer. They’ll certainly lose some users. But Windows will still remain as top dog, most likely. And I doubt that’ll ever change so long as traditional desktop computers and laptops still exist.

      • morrowind@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Windows isn’t the issue here. The war profiteering is coming from the AI and cloud divisions

        • SilentObserver@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          Ok cool. But I was replying to the comment regarding Microsoft forcing new computers on people. So no need for the correction.

    • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      i agree with what you’re saying from an ethical standpoint. i think she’s right to protest.

      but it’s not “an issue”, it’s a huge fucking client of theirs. from a business standpoint its a huge ask to fire a whole military as a customer.

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        6 days ago

        Surely there’s an option between “drop major client” and “punish the person pointing out problems”

          • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            It didn’t have to. You only expect it to because there’s a history of companies being shitty.

          • Psycoder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 days ago

            Not only will they fire her, they will also be less willing to hire other Palestinians in the future.

            I don’t know about Microsoft but a FAANG company I worked for had very well documented means of raising ethical or legal issues within the company. She just violated her employment contract and possibly her NDA with the company by doing this.

            I don’t mean to say she is right/wrong. It is just that she did not follow the guidelines of the company she works for. Therefore she will be fired even if she is right/wrong.

        • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          So a choice between money and ethics.
          There is never any question which one companies choose.
          Certainly not the one with a carreer in scumbaggery.

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        6 days ago

        “We cant stop selling to war criminals. They are among our biggest customers.”

        Sounds more like a company that needs to be dismantled and have their leadership face prison sentences. Given the size of Microsoft they could take the hit economically w.o. much hassle. They dont have to be evil. They want to be evil. And we need to punish them for it by boycotting their shit as much as possible.