![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
4·
11 days agoNot in the least it’s the most effective means for shipping methane across such distances. LNG remains liquid across the voyage, and any boil off is used for the ship engines that do not typically use diesel.
Not in the least it’s the most effective means for shipping methane across such distances. LNG remains liquid across the voyage, and any boil off is used for the ship engines that do not typically use diesel.
/s missing
it’s Microsoft so probably not unless corporate account. You know the other solution.
Again it’s because businesses make revenue, i.e. Fiat money and people trade that money and exchange it for things etc…
That’s faith in a business not money
Comparison never made much sense, everyone uses money. The same cannot be said for Bitcoin
Not cost effective by any means, but then again none buys apple for cost effective anything. Some people just the brand it seems 🤦
for once the comparison is apt
Transportation is not, it’s energy intensive producing it, not transporting it. LNG don’t require much refrigeration normally once liquified.
It takes a lot of energy to vaporise LNG and the tanks are designed so that the boil off equals to what the ships engines need .