Have you considered that the answers you seek may be in the article?
Have you considered that the answers you seek may be in the article?
*Charged for falsifying his identity and billing info
Posting AI-generated songs is perfectly legal, and there are other people who have made 6 figures doing this without committing fraud
In most other places…
No, the output in a word processor is explicitly created by the user, whereas the output created by a LLM is based on the training data OpenSI scraped and influenced by a user prompt
Using your logic, the one making the copy in a word processor is the person typing, and the one making the copy in this LLM is OpenAI
He was arrested because he faked a ton of information related to his accounts to make it look like many people were doing it. I love that he gamed the system, but also it sounds like he totally committed financial fraud while doing so.
There are other people who have gamed the system without also committing fraud
That’s not true at all, there are criminal penalties on the books for this sort of thing in pretty much all western countries
Looks like this is happening in Denmark, which has different laws than the US’s “fair use.”
they’ve either done or attempted most of that list
Source: Trust me bro
Storm related blackouts are due to downed power lines largely in the last mile of delivery, not a shortage of available electricity. A battery installation in your neighborhood won’t help when the lines in your neighborhood are down.
That said, Texas’s low barrier to entry has enabled more small scale solar PV and battery installations I think than any other state, and they’re rapidly building them out.
They had made it into a meaningless buzzword well before that.
Zoomers are fine, just making fun of the concept of young people thinking Windows 3.1 couldn’t connect to the internet. America Online, bitch. A/S/L? Also Zi could type my friend’s phone # into Doom and it’d call his modem and we could play each other
Pshhh “zoomers” amiright?!
That fucking algae in the ocean, how does it sleep at night knowing the crimes it’s perpetuating?!
I’m blown away by how many people use apps when they don’t have to. There’s a reason companies are always trying to get you to download their app, and it’s so they can put their software on your phone and harvest more of your data.
So for you, the lowest price is the only thing that matters? It doesn’t matter whether it’s a shitty product? Or that they’re one of the least efficient shippers due to their tariff avoidance strategy, and in doing so are contributing more per purchase to climate change than even companies like Amazon and Walmart?
This graph displays cost based on grams of protein per unit weight, not based on weight alone. You’re comparing items based on weight alone.
You demanding more evidence right now and saying these students’ project “is concerning” is not having a conversation about the validity of their claims, it’s just being petulant. Saying, “I’ll be interested to see the specs” or “I’ll keep an eye out for testing data before I believe this” would convey the same thing without coming off like an asshole
You seem really worked up about these undergrads’ project
Eat my shorts