• 0 Posts
  • 799 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle





  • I wouldn’t put one in charge of a water treatment plant or a set of traffic lights, but even if it stuffed up and killed people, the responsibility would still not be the AI’s. The responsibility would lie with those who built it, trained it, and prompted it, just as, if a bunch of people are fried by a nuclear missile, the responsibility lies with the person who pushed the button rather than with the missile itself. It’s a piece of software. It does what it’s told. It may be complex enough to display unexpected emergent behaviour, but so is Dwarf Fortress. Any destruction it accomplishes is just the real-world version of !!Fun!!, disgusting concept though that may be.



  • The short version: Most of them spammed people, except possibly for the one that slept 70% of the time. None of them came up with a product or service anyone sensible would buy even if a human was providing it. Alas, none of them ordered tungsten cubes, either. It was a bunch of particularly boring fails.

    All this money, all these resources, to produce artificial con artists. As though we didn’t have enough of the natural organic sort.




  • The link could very well lead to malicious javascript or a phishing site, yes. You could be a hacker, troll, or foreign rabble-rouser. We can’t tell. And the audience on Lemmy has a lot more sysadmins, programmers, and other IT people than the average. A lot of us have had to clean up a corporate network after a ransomware attack. We’re aware of the risks of clicking on the wrong thing in a way you may not be.

    The site you linked to looks suspicious because it’s unfamiliar, it shows only a login screen to anyone not logged in (and nothing at all if you visit it with Javascript off, which is a wise precaution for dubious sites if you’re going to visit them anyway). Now, granted, if you are not the owner of the site, this is not your fault. It just doesn’t help your case.

    If you had a history on Lemmy, we’d have some basis for determining whether or not you were legit. Since you have none, we have to guess, and the default is to not trust people.

    It isn’t that you did anything wrong, exactly. It’s just that many of us aren’t willing to take the chance.




  • nyan@lemmy.cafetoTechnology@lemmy.worldAudacity 4.0 is finally out!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    I apologize for phrasing things so poorly that several people seem to have missed my actual point, which was: no one else with an auto-update feature requires any information about you, therefore if they claim that’s their reason for asking for users’ personal information, they’re lying. They may have other reasons, which they have not stated. They may even be good reasons, although I’m not holding my breath.

    And yes, I have compiled my own copy with that nonsense switched off, thanks for asking. However, it’s the job of people who understand that this is overreach to push back against it on behalf of the people who lack the knowledge, time, or energy to investigate it. I don’t like throwing even Windows users under the bus.



  • nyan@lemmy.cafetoTechnology@lemmy.worldAudacity 4.0 is finally out!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 days ago

    Why would I want an auto-update mechanism in the software? That’s what my distro’s package manager is for. And it doesn’t care who I am or where I’m from. Nor has any other software I’ve encountered with such a useless-to-Linux-users mechanism demanded any information about me.

    In short, that rationale is obvious nonsense. That may be why they claim they’re doing it, but it doesn’t hold up.