That’s what I meant by it’s ambiguous. There is no policy or clarification and I am not suggesting a policy. Everything you said is perfectly valid and no immigrants should not be bound to.province of arrival, maybe for certain number of years if it comes down to that.
I disagree, let’s say Netflix looses 50% Canadian Market or McDonals looses half the customers as a direct result of boycotting. They won’t want to affect policy change, it won’t affect their bottom lines? What If people from other countries follow the example? That would also spur now investment into domestic market to spur new companies to replace those services . Loblaws and the likes started shutting their pants when Loblaws out of control Sub made news.
I’d rather do something than just talk on an online forum.
Isn’t boycotting punishing the rich?
I did as soon as Trump said 51st state the first time. Reddit was the last thing. Switched to Lemmy after the annexation attempt disguised as trade deal.
Well f their social media! Stop using American Social media. See how long it takes before they change their tone.
I do believe provinces should have more control over immigration ( from outside Canada, not interprovincial). Every thing else on that referendum is junk. Then again the way even immigration control question is, it could mean interprovincial migration or simply a province to say we will only allow certain race in.
SO NO to everything on that referendum.
Well unlikely and do not work are two ifferent things. They will work if an effort is made.