there are probably simpler apps that can work for OP. I recall seeing one called Pavucontrol or something on Flathub.

that’s the great thing about privacy - its none of ya business

I’m running into similar issues, do you mind expanding on your solutions?

Awesome, at least good to hear it’s being taken seriously now!

booted by signed UKI images. Root is LUKS protected and unlocked by TPM2. This combination protects your system from outside modification.

This is cool. I remember hearing even all the Fedora-based atomic distros don’t use UKI, so they are vulnerable to initramfs modifications

are you using vpn or tor? sometimes they just hate privacy, and there probably aren’t enough vpn/tor users for them to care about them

You’re not contradicting what I said. Apple gets to choose whether they want to cooperate or not, based on their own “morals” and profit motives. Chinese companies don’t get that choice

Good thing it takes one click to change exit

Still works using Tor Browser

Can’t redlib operators just use a reddit account for? Login to get past the login wall, and then fetch requests for other users

Apple makes computers? You can turn an Apple computer into a router in 10 minutes using docker

It’s not “AI”. Doesn’t exist.

At this point it doesn’t matter what you call it. The results are real.

At least in the west the companies can fight back, like Apple has done a few times. In China the government can force companies to do their bidding.

I was talking about his venture into PopOS that was 4 years ago. It does seem like he has warmed up to Linux much more in the past few months, that’s pretty cool

I mean not all distros need to do that. Immutable distros will not let you break them like that

If you gave a scrolling wall of terminal text to the average PC user and then asked “yes or no”, they will just say “yes”. The point of Linus’s video was “is Linux ready for mainstream”, so his actions were fair imo. Linux users forget how simple using a PC is (or at least was) on Windows and Mac.

You would get the same result on any operating system by disregarding a warning like that.

When does Windows or MacOS allow you to purge your desktop environment? They would simply not install the software. They wouldn’t give you the option to break your PC in the first place

To be fair the last time I saw Linus try linux, he tried to install steam and the package manager removed the entire desktop environment. This was PopOS, and PopOS clarified in the comments that Linus just so happened to be making the video when there was a big bug in their system. So I don’t fault Linus for being a bit put off

Instead of caddy -> auth OIDC -> services, can you do auth OIDC -> caddy -> services? That way you can put the auth OIDC in the DMZ VM, while putting caddy in the other VM with all the services? Alternatively maybe caddy (DMZ) -> auth OIDC (DMZ) -> caddy (LAN) -> services (LAN)

If you can’t, you can always use firewalls on the services VM to prevent services from talking to each other. Preventing them from talking to the internet can be achieved by putting them in an “internal” network (if using docker compose, set “internal: true” when defining the network)

These comments are why privacy products will always be behind. Why open-source is full of dead projects. These people are just trying to make a living off making privacy-focused products. And all the comments are like “They’re a for-profit company? They had marketing material prepped to reply to people’s comments?!”.

The code is open-source, self-hostable, built using commodity hardware (raspi), and they’re just trying to make it sustainable by providing an optional paid service. This is not the enemy.