He threw $44 billion at it for the right to destroy it. It wasnt worth that much.
He threw $44 billion at it for the right to destroy it. It wasnt worth that much.
Weird how many “false positives” they get. Uncanny.
Not to say that anything about the project is good, but the first human implantee is very much alive.
It’s still important to point out, especially for narcissists that have that much influence.
Trump didn’t cause it, so he had no need to project.
The problem isn’t the search engine - it’s the money.
Disclaimer: I only know what I just looked up. Not a big wrestling watcher personally.
From what I can tell there’s two separate titles. The Mae Young Classic had two tournaments in 2017 & 2018. The Great Moolah was announced in 2018, subsequently changing the name to WrestleMania Women’s Battle Royal. It also has only had two tournaments, in 2018 & 2019.
As for the logo/trophy, WrestleMania Women’s Battle Royal looks like this, and the Mae Young Classic looks like this. I couldn’t find any info on previous versions, but if there was one that looked more like a vagina, it might as well be an anatomical model.
New humans cost money, and might not obey their corporate overlords.
Gonna find out real quick that Apple is more important to people than Twitter.
If Twitch’s little experiment is anything to go by, it already is.
Oh no! Wait, I don’t use that shit because of shit like this.
FFs took a huge paycheck of blood money that they could’ve easily turned down. They’re in it too.
Don’t blame him because he’s just “making money”? Might as well not blame the execs with that logic. They’re also just making money, right?
Unless I’m misunderstanding it myself, fixed term means they had a set period of time that’s not up for renewal. Ergo, when the term runs out, that’s it. There’s no chance of delinquency because there’s no additional payments.
“Fixed Term” does not mean “delinquent”. It just means there’s a hard cut off. All I know is the snippet you posted, though, so maybe there’s more to the situation.
That’s not what I got out of that at all. It looks more like an errant setting made the account expire automatically after some amount of time, triggering the wipe.
Even saying they’re guessing is wrong, as that implies intention. LLMs aren’t trying to give an answer, let alone a correct answer. They just put words together.
It wouldn’t be anything specific. The disclaimers would just be overbroad stuff like “Please verify this answer. Google is not responsible for anything. Blah blah blah.”
and the first thing they tell us is “don’t worry, the data’s fine”, rather than anything about the human.
I do agree it would have been significantly more considerate to mention that the person is ok first, but I feel like you’re confusing data storage (ie something they’re collecting) with data processing (ie how the device operates). The data in question is the latter. In other words, they are explaining that the problems are being accounted for so that the device can still function in the human it’s attached to.
Instagram has it’s fair share of blame for the trend, but I don’t think they were the progenitor, as it were. Snapchat was far more heavy-handed with face altering filters from the get-go, as I remember it. Instagram was mostly just the “old-school” sepia tone, black-and-white type filters for the most part until that picked up.