hunter 2
unhackable
hunter 2
unhackable
an email for a receiver that doesn’t exist, more often than not, goes back to the sender after e.g. 72h. That’s by design.
IME they usually proxy and/or prefetch images for caching instead of blocking them. Only spam content is blocked by default.
tldr
I’m glad they’re moving the world update and other massive downloads to something in the cloud and on-demand. Anything between 10-40% of my “play time” on steam was actually downloading stuff.
And I thought developers were bad at naming.
The Microsoft school of naming things is really showing their ways
as opposed to human-generated code
mah man
man man
oh man
bit of a useless twitter post
alphaxiv https://www.alphaxiv.org/
they have moved, but I wouldn’t call a 40" TV large for almost 10 years now.
so… people who take typing lessons and actively try to improve it have better typing skills than the ones who don’t. Shocking.
Learn a docker compose deploy. It’s a knowledge that pays off for services other than jellyfin too.
Collectibles are non-fungible tokens by definition, and blockchain is just a data structure.
I don’t care about collectibles / NFTs, but this is nothing new in the gaming world.
Since I was a poor little kid in the slums of Nairobi with no internet access I dreamed about having a
<service>
account. […]
idk where that number came from, but there’s a survey from 2022 listing 11,630 providers. That would average 2.08 per municipality and makes sense imo. The larger-scale telecom infrastructure is still an oligopoly though.
I’ve hacked plenty of bash aliases, functions, and scripts using coreutils myself; but sometimes you need something a bit more robust when it comes to error handling, retrying, maintainability, and an actually distributed solution instead.
xargs
on its own might be more resilient than a distributed crawler, as one would expect, but if I’m tasked with building a distributed data processing pipeline I want more guarantees from the system as a whole, not only from its individual building blocks.
The time and effort put into embedding these guarantees in hacked shell scripts running on a dozen machines might be better invested into building a more solid foundation instead.
only 5 commits less than 14 years old
I think you’re looking at the latest commit in each branch. There are ~40 commits this year.
These things are the other way around. The older something is, the more likely it is to find a bunch of questionable choices, spaghetti code, and security holes.
The questions I have surround the “since 2012” bit. FB exists since 2004, so what happened in 2012? Was it a data dump, a careless logger, system migration, or something else?