I’m laughing at your little meltdown.
Don’t post about crypto if you can’t tolerate mild mockery.
LOL cry harder
I was just going to laugh but yours works too.
Sorry, that’s not Kosher.
But compared to plastic from virgin fossil fuels?
We as a society are going to need memory cards.
What do you think they should be made out of?
But most steel is recycled and most plastic is not.
Half the article is about how it takes 4 bad CEOs to wreck a company and Intel is far down that path.
Deloitte should be liable for the medical bills of patients who it wrongly denied coverage for.
They saved money by skipping QA, they can pay for the fallout of their bugs.
Fuck off with false equivalence you friend of butchers.
It’s only arguable if you’re arguing for genocide.
Google is taking money to defend genocide.
How does the efficiency and cost of buck converters compare to AC transformers? Seems like the cost and efficiency of the voltage converter should be the prime determinant, rather than specific applications of generation/consumption.
What would a 400A 10kV utility scale DC converter look like?
No, you make a management API for security products that run in user space as root, you don’t use kernel modules.
Running security products in kernel mode is precisely what caused this disaster.
This is also MS’s fault because they never provided a proper API for security products like MacOS, so they end up having to run them all inside the kernel.
The reason for this omission was to give a competitive advantage to their own security products while also being cheaper.
Unexpected item in bagging are? I think you meant free item in bagging area.
Self driving taxis are definitely happening, but the people getting rich in a gold rush are the people selling shovels.
Uber has no structural advantage because their unique value proposition is the army of cheap drivers.
Guy who buys programmers and sells AI thinks he can sell more AI and stop buying programmers.
This is up there with Uber pretending self driving cars will make them rich.
It’s frustrating that the article deals treats the problem like the mistake was including Martin’s name in the data set, and muses that that part isn’t fixable.
Martin’s name is a natural feature of the data set, but when they should be taking about fixing the AI model to stop hallucinations or allow humans to correct them, it seems the only fix is to censor the incorrect AI response, which gives the implication that it was saying something true but salacious.
Most of these problems would go away if AI vendors exposed the reasoning chain instead of treating their bugs as trade secrets.