

Nah, I think all of it is literally just public data offered up by users themselves. If you didn’t want those opinions shared, you shouldn’t have posted them on Reddit.
I have no clue why you are on my page, but please:
And most essentially:
(She/Her)
Nah, I think all of it is literally just public data offered up by users themselves. If you didn’t want those opinions shared, you shouldn’t have posted them on Reddit.
What is the game, if I may ask? We might be able to better help if you just tell us. Because none of us want you to feel entrapped by MS.
What if people just learned to use Firefox or NewPipe?
Linux Mint DE and Arch, the ultimate duo of Stability/Freindlyness & Power/Control
Linux Mint DE and Arch, the ultimate duo of Stability/Freindlyness & Power/Control
Am I the only one who beleives that it would have been a more effective arguement to try and use the 4th amendment instead of the 1st? Violating free speech is just a weak claim, but “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches…” seems quite relevent here. But I am also not a lawyer.
Well, youtube is not even intended to host quality content anymore, but besides that, this appears to just be visual tweaks. This title is trying to be vague enough that one could assume it’s tweaking the content itself which would be of real concern. It’s not doing that (for now). Video graphics seems like an awefully minor thing to be screaming about AI over. Especially when AI has actual reprocussions in the knowledge accuracy sector.