I see no problem here.
Well, assuming you see having domestic content as a valid goal, anyway, which isn’t necessarily a given.
Formerly u/CanadaPlus101 on Reddit.
I see no problem here.
Well, assuming you see having domestic content as a valid goal, anyway, which isn’t necessarily a given.
Yup. China might go for Taiwan if they’re sure they can get away with it, but that’s all. I don’t really expect them to dick around with MAD; they’re rational actors, at least at this point in history. Russia’s goose is already cooked, and I doubt an order to attack NATO out of the blue would even be obeyed.
Edit: The article talks about a cluster of unspecified regional wars, which seems much more likely, though.
I mean, if escalation goes all the way there’s not much use to a conventional army anymore.
As far as I can tell there’s general outrage about both. Although keeping score, this guy did it a decade or more later.
I mean, if you want to take the cosmic perspective, blackface is fine too. It’s only forbidden because it was used for really racist purposes in recent history.
Something something coconut tree.
The undecided ones? Probably. People usually have some hope they’re finally going to find an honest politician (but no attention span for what that would actually look like). Plus, I’m a cynical activist, I’ve seen the sausage being made, and even I find it repulsive he’s moving from spin and weasel words to straight up lies and open hypocrisy.
Hard core supporters might simply be glad he’s doing whatever it takes to win, but that was always a given.
You think people who are undecided about voting for me check that?
- Poilievre
I mean, if you’re going with the libertarian logic, we don’t need unions, but there’s also no such thing as “low-cost labour”. People get paid what they’re worth to employers.
If you want wages higher than that, you need collective bargaining.
So were these bought through the new ultra-thorough procurement process the takes forever, or the old one? I’ve heard the ultra-thoroughness was a reaction to this kind of thing.
Fun fact, if you can’t strike you don’t have unions.
I have no idea if you think we should buy less from China, or stop complaining about buying from China, but either way you’re right about the hypocrisy, or at least lack of self awareness.
It’s the zeitgeist, right? More protectionism, both for geopolitical reasons and (fake) economic reasons
To Poilievre it seems to be a game he needs to play as hard as possible to win. I bet he’s semi-open about his disregard for accuracy the moment the cameras are off.
Honestly, I blame the voters for not noticing.
I mean, they put in the carbon tax. I’d say they’ve taken action on that one.
I was kind of expecting them to go wildcat like in Ontario. It worked there, and there’s zero chance the Liberals would want to take heat over sending in the riot police on picket lines.
Why yes, future person, I’ll fix the spelling.
I didn’t get an underline because it was capitalised, apparently.
It’s not hypocrisy if she was lying about why she doesn’t like wind farms in the first place.
I mean, she was elected by a whole 1300 votes.
She would have to gerrymander very, very hard to win that way. Like, she’s basically have to cut the two cities into nonexistance.
Interesting that they’re pumping back money into traditional radio.
Gee, that’s not the history I remember. I’m not super familiar, but wasn’t it about holding back Americanisation? (We have radio band allocations separately)