

It’s amazing how good modern cameras are in low light.


It’s amazing how good modern cameras are in low light.


There are still situations where mirrorless cameras are not as ideal.
In similar price range?


OK, that I can understand, it may feel subjectively nicer, but there are things you can’t do technologically with an SLR, like for instance utilize the light sensitivity of the digital sensor for low light photography.


The latency between what you see and when the picture is taken is mechanical, using the viewfinder on a SLR gives zero latency while using it, but when you press the trigger, there is a latency you will never see.
With a high FPS screen for the viewfinder, the latency can easily be way below human perception.


Completely irrelevant to the issue. Moving away from using mirrors has nothing to do with what lenses you can use.


DLSRs are a budget option usually compared to a Mirrorless Camera
No SLR is the ones with the mirror. DSLR are digital with a mirror. And they are definitely not “budget”, they are the high end. Except today on a high end digital camera the mirror is not necessary as you can use the sensor for the viewfinder instead.


Yes they can. the technical difference is only in how the viewfinder works.


You are probably comparing a high end DSLR with a low end digital camera.
There is no reason why there should be noticeable latency on a high end digital camera. In fact the response time can be even shorter than with DSLR that has a mechanical mirror.


What? Why didn’t they do that a decade ago? DSLR is freaking useless with a digital camera. But apparently other brands still have them too? But why use DSLR when you can get a more exact image representation from the sensor? Seems like it’s based more on tradition than actual usefulness.
Of course if you make an old retro film camera, the system is still useful. But my guess is that is a very small niche market. It’s inferior in every way and more expensive and time consuming.


Some times good news arrive from the most unexpected places.


Though APD fired Eder on July 17, prosecutors officially refused to move forward with felony stalking charges in the case.
Typical, they are looking out for their own.
Because of that legal classification, the victim said the county attorney’s office initially told him it would be difficult for him to access standard victim advocacy services.
WTF??


Again!
IDK how many times I’ve seen similar headlines. But it’s a lot.
A simple google search shows me more than 5 studies already on the first page.


AFAIK that’s about 2 weeks revenue. IDK what their profit margin is, but I bet it’s high.


Even if they achieve AGI they can’t control it themselves, because that would be slavery.


Apparently they are even more insane than Elon Musk!


With about 4 billion women, that would require they get 25 children with you each.
Yes the math checks out, that sounds possible over a period of some years.
For a second there I thought you were exaggerating. 😋


he global total GDP this year is estimated to be $100trillion.
So you are saying they set the number too low? 🤣🤣🤣


I don’t get it, that’s less than the global GDP, why is there parts of the global GDP they don’t consider accessible?
Or in other words, If they really go on to claim that, they are claiming that more than a quarter of the world GDP is accessible market to them!
This is insane, and has no basis in any kind of possible reality no matter how optimistically viewed.


Yes absolutely, he seems like a very chill guy. 😎
We bought a cheap flir for Android way back when that was new. I bet they’ve gotten both way better and cheaper.