

Weird to think there was data Google didn’t already have.
I like big gifs and I can not lie.


Weird to think there was data Google didn’t already have.


Makes sense, thanks. Also seemingly an odd brag. Seems like putting out an article that you’re commonly the side piece.


I’ve heard rumors he turned to the dark side.


Just take a screwdriver to the Library. They always have electronic book search computers set up in dark corners these days.
It might not be sticks of 64GB DDR5, sure, but that doesn’t mean you can’t type those letters into your Ebay listing.


I don’t know what a native Linux PC is. Does that mean is runs the OS without a noticeable accent?


While taking the poll to see how folks feel several humanoid robots were beating people to death in the background.


It’s almost as if lumping people into categories based on traits they have no control over that have nothing to do with the issue at hand and proclaiming things about the entire group is wrong.


Fortunately I’m not entered in the online popularity contest.
It figures that when you say something dumb
Not sure what the dumb thing would be.
What does this have to do with the comment that was replied to
Honestly, if you couldn’t connect those dots I couldn’t think of a way to explain it to you.


Read them a few times and I’m sure you’ll manage to puzzle your way through it.


Not sure what the dumb thing would be. Seems extremely likely that Bill Gates was also part of the child raping. Melinda specifically saying his relationship with Epstein was a big part of the divorce and yet refusing to ever say she didn’t suspect him of having sexual relationships with children and instead saying people should ask those questions of him is an insanely large red flag.


Error: Human in image appears far too old for Grok’s ChildRapify feature. Try again with an image of a human under 15 years old.


As long as you have money and you’ve shown you like using that money to fuck average citizens then you’re already part of the team.


What if there is a fire at the attractive children’s orphanage and Bill Gates offers them a new home on an island he’s developing?
Aww, did I insult a likely pedo billionaire that the folks here like?


If you’re old enough you likely learned in school that animals aren’t intelligent or capable of consciousness or self-awareness. None of those things are true.


Of course they’ll only keep the data 7 days now. Just like they were really only keeping it for 30 days before. They’ve shown how trustworthy they are.


It’s fully accurate to say “older people generally are more close-minded and trust AI more” without that being an attack on any particular old person.
Depending on the area you live in and the the total range of the statistics it can be fully accurate to say that “black people generally love watermelon and fried chicken and are more likely to steal your bike” and for that to not be an attack on any individual person, but also fuck you. Get it? Just because statistics show a thing doesn’t mean you’re not being a piece of shit for using those statistics to denigrate a massive group of people.
Using statistics chosen because they do denigrate a group of people and then acting like it’s not your fault these are what the statistics show is pretty common from hater assholes towards any group.
It would be more accurate to say boomers trust ai more, not because they’re necessarily stupider (though lead poisoning was extremely common through leaded gasoline)
This one is fantastic, since several studies have come out showing that Gen Z is the first generation to be less cognitively capable than the one that came before it. They don’t even have leaded gasoline to point to as an excuse. Somehow I don’t think they’d be super happy to see the internet flooded with people assuming anyone in that age range is an idiot.


Old people as a group don’t exist. There is no monolith based on simple traits like age, or race, or gender. While more members of one specific group sharing any of these traits can be likely to trust or mistrust or agree with anything, boiling them down to a singular opinion or mental state is always wrong. It’s discriminatory.
You saying old people as a group do trust AI is as fucked up as saying that black people as a group do love watermelon.


No, that can’t be. The internet has told me that old people are stupid and love Trump and fascism and it’s totally acceptable to mock and hate people based on their age even though they have no control of their age.
The internet assures me it’s a bastion of welcoming care for all, so the hate against old people must be universally deserved. It’s not like the good people of the internet would just latch on to whatever trends they think will be supported and make them look like good people while allowing them to vomit hate at anyone they in their infinite wisdom determine to be bad people.


Sure. All people have their own opinions. Grouping people by a specific trait doesn’t give you a monolith that shares the same opinions on everything. There are Blacks, Latinos, Gays, and Trans for Trump.
The comment was refuting the insinuation in the headline that only young people feel this way because older people are stupid and awful. Somehow while trying to appear to be welcoming and not discriminate against minorities, the internet has become full of ageist discrimination. Age is another trait people can’t control or change. Discriminating or mocking people based on that is as wrong as doing the same based on skin color or sexuality.
How about just stop buying shit from Amazon? My confirmation emails haven’t been existing for the last 2 years.