You sound like you’re really fun and easy to work with.

It needs to be specific to be clear for its purposes. You can express everything in simpler terms but then you risk leaving things out of definitions. It’s basically legal speak.

Normally, you’d read the scope of such a document to see whether it fits your purpose, then cherry-pick the chapters necessary. If something’s unclear, you can google pretty much everything.

Doing that a few times will make it infinitely easier! You especially get to understand those broad, inaccessible definitions a lot easier.

And for the full Linux experience do it at the perfect moment, such as when you’re in a lecture or customer presentation!

If you show me how that’s physically possible I will concede your point, but until then: No, that’s not nearly the same. You can’t just selectively block physical ads.

While the comparison may make sense when not thinking it through, print is a completely different medium than digital where comparisons only make limited sense. In this one they don’t at all.

Physical media does not track views (directly) or click through numbers, for example.

You are just self-important and cannot come to terms with reality, lol. All those creators and their content would not exist in this form, for free, without YouTube. All other platforms are locked behind a paywall.

But geniuses like you then talk down paywalls as well, because how dare they monetize their time?! You just want everything for free - be honest about it.

They talked about it in the WAN show and they do not share that data as of a few months ago.

They talked about it in the WAN show and they do not share that data as of a few months ago.

SponsorBlock does not change anything about the money they get from sponsorships. So no, that does not help them more than otherwise.

You’re really spending a lot of energy calling piracy not piracy.

You’re just justifying your actions. YouTube is not free to run, and the content there is not free to create. You’re a parasite.

Don’t worry, I’m as well - but be honest about it. What you’re doing, and many other gigabrains here, is just pathetic. There is a lot of corporate greed in this world, but this ain’t it.

No, that’s called nuance and honesty.

Satoshi Nakamoto is some kind of consipracy…?

https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

Satoshi Nakamoto.

https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

The corruption drips slowly inside as well.

I do as well!

Login pages ;D

Removed by mod

Yeah, most effective illegal hackers are working for intelligence agencies or criminal organizations. The legal ones work for companies.

The ones “for the people” are very few.

The bottom bar ain’t staying though if everyone does it.

Well from a professional here: It is.