• Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    10 hours ago

    When they removed their “don’t be evil” motto, I thought it was hilariously bad optics but probably came from some misguided thinking that if they stopped talking about the potential for evil, people would stop wondering whether they had bad motives and needed the motto to keep straight.

    It became clearer and clearer that they removed the motto because they felt it was holding them back from greater profits and was skewing employee behaviours in ways they didn’t want and bringing up objections to policy ideas that they wanted to avoid. It was never about the optics, it was about the profits.

    Now, when Google removes a pledge not to make portable killer AIs and skynet, you have to accept that it’s because they see making portable killer AIs and skynet as hugely profitable for them, and they don’t want any good intentions or moral behaviour getting in the way of that profit.

    • truthfultemporarily@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      32 minutes ago

      A thing I want to point out about publicly traded companies is that they are legally required to maximize shareholder profit.

      So if a CEO refuses to do something immoral that would increase profits, the shareholders can sue to have them fired and replaced with someone else.

      Not protecting any company here but this entire system is fucked and clearly leads to enshittyfication and immoral actions becoming the norm.