moe90@feddit.nl to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agoX expands lawsuit over advertiser ‘boycott’ to include Lego, Nestlé, Pinterest, and others | TechCrunchtechcrunch.comexternal-linkmessage-square174fedilinkarrow-up1741arrow-down122
arrow-up1719arrow-down1external-linkX expands lawsuit over advertiser ‘boycott’ to include Lego, Nestlé, Pinterest, and others | TechCrunchtechcrunch.commoe90@feddit.nl to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square174fedilink
minus-squareRhaedas@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up82·4 days agoNot if there’s fewer there to see ads. They’re still a business with a bottom line, even if what they do is terrible.
minus-squaredanc4498@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 days agoLess of a boycott and more of a logical business decision.
minus-squareAnivia@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days ago Not if there’s fewer there to see ads But you usually pay per click or impression, not a flat rate. So that alone shouldn’t be a reason for them to stop advertising there
Not if there’s fewer there to see ads. They’re still a business with a bottom line, even if what they do is terrible.
Yea, fair point.
Less of a boycott and more of a logical business decision.
But you usually pay per click or impression, not a flat rate. So that alone shouldn’t be a reason for them to stop advertising there