• ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    20 days ago

    Really, this is just a wakeup call for everyone that was putting of going cloud native on apps. The potential costs of staying in VMWare are now higher than migrating, plus now there’s the added incentive of getting rid of ancient technical debt. Overall, it’s a good thing from a security and long-term cost standpoint for most of these businesses.

    • med@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 days ago

      Doesn’t help the microsoft was playing chicken with the upcoming EOL for supported on-prem exchange. What are people even going to run on their vmware? /s

    • bradd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      There are alternate on-prem solutions that are now good enough to compete with vmware, for a majority of the people impacted by vmwares changes. I think the cloud ship has sailed and the stragglers have reasons for not moving to the cloud, and in many cases companies nove back from the cloud once they realize just how expensive it actually is.

      I think one of the biggest drivers for businesses to move to the cloud is they do not want to invest in talent, the talent leaves and it’s hard to find people who want to run in house infra for what is being offered. That talent would move on to become SRE’s for hosting providers, MSP’s, ISP’s, and so on. The only option the smaller companies have would be to buy into the cloud and hire what is essentially an administrator and not a team of architects, engineers, and admins.