• BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Not OP check out my username for an idea of where I live. Besides a bit of gang on gang action in our capital, violent crimes are extremely rare. It’s maybe once a year that police have to shoot at a person, and even then police officers will assess the situation and if possible not go for center mass.

    Note how I left out theft. That’s because you can’t directly use violence to protect property.

    • capital@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Note how I left out theft. That’s because you can’t directly use violence to protect property.

      I remember hearing this when I lived in the UK for a few years and I was blown away. What are you expected to do if being robbed? Let it happen?

        • capital@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Yeah, not here.

          I’ve had shit stolen. The police “handled it” to an extent but we will never get back priceless family heirlooms given to us from my wife’s side of the family. Fuck thieves.

          • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Did you not have a gun at the time? Or did your ownership of a gun not prevent the theft?

                • capital@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  28 minutes ago

                  I honestly can’t tell if this is sarcasm or if you have reading comprehension problems.

                  I wasn’t home. There was no possibility for me to prevent this theft, gun or no gun.

                  If it’s sarcasm meant to show that things can happen even when armed, no shit. If that is meant to show I shouldn’t have one at all, would the counterfactual (situations in which a theft or assault were stopped or prevented) be sufficient to show one should carry?

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    25 minutes ago

                    Dude, you’re the one talking about how guns can stop theft and your example was a theft that you were not able to stop with a gun. That’s not my fault.

          • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Agreed thieves are terrible.

            Not many better options if you are getting robbed though.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Call the police. Are you in physical danger? If not why are you putting yourself in physical danger?

        • capital@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I don’t think I understand your question.

          What scenario are you imagining with these questions?