• oce 🐆@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        No, but I think it could make the knowledge more easily available which increases the risk that it may happen.

          • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I think I heard about it before, but instead of having to remember that, I could just ask an uncensored LLM.

            • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              The actual point was, bomb making instructions have been floating around on search engine results since the days of dial up. That particular manuscript itself has existed since before the days of the Internet. There’s nothing cgpt could give you that you couldn’t have found by typing the same query into Google. Getting the instructions is literally the easiest, least effort, least risk part of building a bomb.