Fast food restaurant Wendy’s plans Uber-like surge pricing, with digital menu boards that change prices depending on demand::The price of a Wendy’s Frosty could soon fluctuate throughout the day as the chain looks to introduce Uber-like surge pricing on its menu.

  • jeremyparker@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    What are you talking about? Just because they aren’t calling it “surge” doesn’t mean it’s not surge. Unless you’re just saying you prefer the term “gouging”?

    In a statement Wednesday, Wendy’s clarified that “dynamic pricing” will include new menus that could offer discounts at slower times of the day, denying the company will raise prices during peak demand.

    Lowering prices, also known as “discounts,” and then restoring prices after the “discount” can be understood in reverse: prices go from “normal” to “increased”.

    Given the fact that they (like every other fast food company) always charge the absolute maximum the market will bear, then any price – even a reduced one – is still going to be what they calculate to be the maximum. The fact that the maximum is different at times of “increased demand” is exactly what surge pricing is.

    • IndyRap@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Well dynamic pricing and surge pricing in practice are the opposite. Both raise prices.

      Surge pricing raises it on peak times while dynamic does it throughout the day and usually during off-peak times to subsidize on peak times.

      Surge pricing is vastly different than dynamic pricing. Surge pricing has not chance of working in retail when competition exists.

      Dynamic pricing is done in retail already and no one bats an eye at it.

      Tesla does dynamic pricing. Fuel stations do dynamic pricing.

      Energy companies do surge pricing. Uber does surge pricing.

      When there’s a monopoly on a market you wouldn’t do dynamic pricing.

      But also it’s why heavy regulation is done.

      Uber broke this model because they get to operate as a monopoly while gouging their customers.

      I’m not defending Wendy’s but as someone in pricing this is a vastly different thing and is 100 times worse than dynamic pricing.

      • jeremyparker@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I get what you’re saying, but it honestly sounds like kool aid drinking. “Surge” vs “dynamic” might be different in terms of back end calculation, but the external appearance is the same.

        Again, you have to remember that prices are still maxed out. Think about it this way: if you normally wear 2000 calories a day, and every now and then you have an extra donut or burger and that puts you at 2500, that’s only balanced if, on other days, you have only 1500 calories. If the only exceptions are in the “plus” direction, the average is up.

        Dynamic pricing is done in retail already and no one bats an eye at it.

        Don’t mistake prior not knowing about it for people saying they think it’s ok. If this is happening in retail, and people knew, they wouldn’t be happy.

        Surge pricing is toxic and needs to stop.

        • IndyRap@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          External appearance is not the same for both. Elasticity of demand during seasonal time of day and weekday seasonality proves it

          People don’t like surge pricing with Uber but they have no choice there’s really no competition. Lyft is the only one so they both do it.

          Dynamic pricing is done because of lack of pricing power and monopoly. Most restaurants are franchises. You can’t get franchisees to exhibit monopoly power because they compete amongst themselves in the same brand and vs others. Aside from the fact that it’s illegal.

          I’m not saying it’s good just totally not the same.

          Dynamic pricing is sneaky and hard to pay attention to. Surge pricing isn’t.

          Dynamic pricing allows competition at certain times but screws over people that don’t buy into loyalty cards rewards points or just doesn’t go to the store when everyone else does.

          I’m literally the customer that gets punished.

          Companies don’t care about customers unless elasticity is proven. They will test elasticity until net margin is maxed out at optimal volume. It’s why Netflix doesn’t give a shit about raising prices. When done in chunks and averaged over time people continue to pay.

          Whereas when it’s done in large quantities it has bigger effect on prompt demand.

          Fuel stations will raise prices at odd peak times when people that don’t “shop” for fuel get fuel. Then they ramp it down just before peak times.

          If customers have loyalty or rewards they typically will be free of these issues because of timed promotions but mostly these prices are inelastic at those times. Which proves that those people don’t care.

          These things are like anything else. The loudest people make noise. consumers don’t stop their habits easily unless they feel they don’t have a choice. Hence why surge pricing wouldn’t work in retail.

          I’ve worked in retail operations, pricing, and manage/execute machine learning for these projects. You can try to explain it to me and why you think it’s the same but respectfully you’re just patently wrong.

          If people actually knew the difference they could look for it but they won’t if everyone just says it’s all the same and mislabels it. People should be looking out for dynamic pricing. Surge pricing doesn’t exist in retail and won’t in the US market.