• Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I imagine open source boot software being better than closed source (a real no brainer) but whats the difficulties with the open one? I’m not very versed in those very low level things.

    • Pantherina@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      All those blobs in there need to be reverse engineered. As there are not that many people doing it, this hardware is often a decade old

      • AlexJD@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Not entirely the case anymore. Libreboot switched to a blob reduction policy in order to support more hardware. Hopefully this will bring things forward quite a bit over the next year.

        • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’m confused. What part of their software is not FOSS? They use CoreBoot for Bios, PopOS is based on Ubuntu and Cosmic is open source too. Do you mean that they still use Nvidia cards in some of their devices?

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            The CPUs require non-free software to boot and function. That’s very hard to get around but it would be interesting if at some point they built a device based on ARM with a chip set that is free.

            On top of that they use Intel WiFi which needs non-free software to work. Ubuntu, pop os and Fedora all ship proprietary software in the kernel to make it work. Admittedly the number of free WiFi cards are limited so maybe it was about tradeoffs.