CBC’s headline (“Canadian economy grew 0.2% in February”) is factual - though I’d prefer if they just said GDP instead of “economy”
“Canada’s economy is losing momentum” is an unqualified statement so it can’t be factual - it doesn’t mention the measurement, aggregation bucket or the comparison baseline. It’s falsifiable but still quite subjective, because if you measure at a quarter-level analysts called it “decent”. Their opening paragraph is more objective than the headline:
The Canadian economy lost momentum in February as it grew at a slower pace than both analyst expectations and Statistics Canada’s previous prediction
And if you yank out the unnecessary subjective addition:
The Canadian economy grew in February at a slower pace than both analyst expectations and Statistics Canada’s previous prediction
You can see how that would have made a more factual but less dramatic headline
Canada’s economy grew in February less than predictions
True, but at least the headline is completely factual and it’s statistics. The numbers comes from Statistics Canada, which is impartial.
Here’s a CBC article reporting the same: https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/canadan-gdp-february-1.7189053
CBC’s headline (“Canadian economy grew 0.2% in February”) is factual - though I’d prefer if they just said GDP instead of “economy”
“Canada’s economy is losing momentum” is an unqualified statement so it can’t be factual - it doesn’t mention the measurement, aggregation bucket or the comparison baseline. It’s falsifiable but still quite subjective, because if you measure at a quarter-level analysts called it “decent”. Their opening paragraph is more objective than the headline:
And if you yank out the unnecessary subjective addition:
You can see how that would have made a more factual but less dramatic headline