• aggelalex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Anti-AI is also not anti-tech. It’s anti-surfdom. This issue wouldn’t be nearly as politicised if people didn’t have to rent it from those massive companies.

    Edit: meant serfdom, but the misspell is funny. I guess riding waves and touching grass aren’t so different after all.

    • FukOui@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Technical progress without societal and moral progress is dangerous.

      If we invent something that is more efficient, cheaper and sustainable but it still remains in the hands of extremist billionaires and governments who would use it to I don’t know kill more children in gaza, it all becomes moot and just serves as a tool for technofascism.

      To play the devil’s advocate, Llms have really good use cases in some niche areas. It’s just that tech bros are just shoving it to our throats, using it to rob the means of labor and surveillance state, plus they own the means of compute and development.

    • moonshadow@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      *serfdom lol

      Please leave it though, made me smile. Who isn’t sick of those tanned bastards waxing their boards and hanging 10?

      • aggelalex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I haven’t heard anyone past the Scam Altman, Dario Amodei and Elon Musk talk shit about local AI models

          • aggelalex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Exactly my point. To me it seems local ai is creating healthy communities and the only ones who actually talk shit about local LLMs are those three idiots