Sixty minutes. That’s how long it took for a private Snapchat message to travel from Kristen Volpe’s phone to the FBI to the deputies standing in her elementary school hallway. On January 29, 2025, the 22-year-old student teacher at John L. Hensey Elementary in Washington, Illinois, vented to her boyfriend and two roommates — three people total — after a student closed her laptop mid-class and wiped her lesson plan. She referenced shooting the student or the school. She meant it as a frustrated joke. Snapchat’s algorithm didn’t get the humor.

No student reported her. No parent. No coworker. The flag was entirely automated. Snapchat’s policy permits voluntary emergency disclosures to law enforcement — no warrant required — when the platform determines imminent harm exists. The algorithm makes that initial call. Think of it like your Ring doorbell deciding to call 911 on its own, except the doorbell is reading your text messages.

  • treadful@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    22 days ago

    The amount of people in this thread that seem to think invasion of privacy is cool to police thought crime is honestly shocking. The subject and subject matter are completely irrelevant.

    In addition, teachers are fucking people and venting and joking in private with close friends is sacrosanct.

    • theherk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 days ago

      My guess is most are very young. Goes to show our civil liberties worldwide, especially since 9/11, have eroded tremendously. Young people have grown up in a world where privacy is a joke and government spying is a foregone conclusion.

      • fartographer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        I work mostly with people older than myself. The younger ones are shocked by everyone’s lackadaisical privacy practices. The older ones all say, “oh well, it’s everywhere and I have nothing to hide. It’s not like you can get away from it.”

        • dreamkeeper@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 days ago

          I don’t know a single young person who actually cares about Internet privacy. The vast majority of them are on social media all the time.

    • TheLegendaryAssholeOfJushinLiger@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      The idea that mass violence, which happens very rarely all things considered, justifies constant mass surveillance and automated reaction is very troubling. The new “think of the children,” I suppose.

    • joe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      If she was in a bar and she was venting to her friends about shooting students or shooting up a school and the bartender heard her and contacted the police, would you call it an invasion of privacy?

      The real story is that people consider unencrypted messages on Snapchat “private”.

    • Tekdeb@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      I believe there are a few things you simply shouldn’t joke about. Killing children is one of those things. But yes, everybody has a fundamental right to their privacy and it’s insane that mass surveillance is becoming more and more common and way too many people seem to just accept or ignore it.

      • DudleyMason@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        I believe there are a few things you simply shouldn’t joke about

        And I believe that belief makes you a dangerous idiot who’ll happily support Fascism.