• Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    That’s right, never trust a private company that might go public in the future.

    That’s why you should build your communities on Discord instead. 🤡

    • TonyOstrich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      That shit is the most infuriating thing ever to me. It seems like so many technical discussions and communities are going to Discord now where that information is not indexed or preserved. How many issues have I had where the answer was sitting on a Discord server that will never appear in any general search result?

  • Engywuck@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    never give a corporation your labour for free.

    People should have known this from the beginning.

    • sanpo@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      These volunteers didn’t think about it in these terms.
      They gave away their work for free to help people learn languages, and for a long time Duolingo seemed like the best platform for that.

      Starting your own platform is much more difficult than contributing to an existing one that seems to be operated with some amount of goodwill…

      • Engywuck@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I understand that. Unfortunately, though, one has to expect always the worst from Corps, no matter how “good” they appear to be at the beginning.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      People who keep trying to do Socialism in a Capitalist system are doomed to fail, because Socialism produces enormous surpluses and Capitalists love to just gobble that shit up.

      • Facebones@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        “If peoples basic needs were met nobody would work!”

        People “work” all the time of their own accord, we just call it volunteering instead of “work.” People love saying “I don’t want to work,” but really what they mean is “I don’t want my economic output stolen from me by my employer while what’s left is stolen by ever increasing prices with no wage adjustment to compensate.”

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          People “work” all the time of their own accord, we just call it volunteering instead of “work.”

          Never even mind volunteering. $50B/year in wage theft in this country. People contract to do labor and then their bosses simply short them. Back in 2019 a coal company attempted to close a mine without paying over $1M in back wages. The workers shut down the rail out of the money and seized the coal until they were made whole.

          Wish more folks who got fleeced by DuoLingo had the gumption to do something similar.

          • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            It’s harder to protest and make demands when most volunteers don’t even know where the fuck Duolingo’s HQ is, much mess live anywhere near it.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Agitate on the forums. Let other people know about open-source alternatives. Organize other power users to submit bad data in protest.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          That depends heavily on how the family operates.

          Historically speaking, the male head-of-household had dictatorial control over the ownership and expenditures within the household. Only in the last two generations have western women gained the right to hold down jobs and assume credit for large purchases, to own their own homes, and to take full custody of their children. The idea of emancipated minors, civil rights for children, and labor protections for young people are even newer. And there are plenty of reactionary political attitudes in the country that would see these reforms rolled back.

          A family certainly can operate in a socialist capacity, when productive property and its surplus is shared equitably. But there are plenty of instances in which the head-of-house is functionally no different than a landlord, demanding the rest of the family live contribute surplus labor while existing in relative poverty.