• runefehay@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    And in the early days of the telephone, switchboard operators would listen in on conversations and cut off anyone they didn’t like. Then in civilized countries, they required phone companies to be common carriers and required police to get warrants if there was anything illegal suspected, to listen in on someone.

    Similar thing with the postal service.

    • Adalast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yup, as I mentioned in my other response to Mr. Strawman that is the difference between a private corporation and a utility. Utilities ARE subject to the first and fourth amendment protections because they are a strange hybrid between public and private.

      • runefehay@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yes, but Meta/Facebook is essentially positioning itself as a monopolistic utility by buying out all its smaller competitors and leveraging itself as one of the few players in the market. There are a lot of people, who if you want to talk to them or see what they have to say, you have to get a Facebook account. This includes politicians and small businesses.

        • Adalast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Eh, its more of an oligopolistic cohort, but yeah. There is a strong argument to be made to classify all communication technology broadly as a utility under the telecom umbrella. That way it can cover all past and future technologies.