• lad@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Okay, so I was wrong

    Edit: it doesn’t even state that it should be close to usable, just that it resembles closely enough. So I admit to being wrong but now I don’t understand your point of it being almost a firearm

    • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      One of the largest markets for replicas is the entertainment industry. Which uses squibs, blanks or other methods to make it look like they were fired. Which without modification can cause serious injury or death.

      Having a pistol that can fire a low charge blank doesn’t need a fully hardened barrel, which on some is easily replaced. As an example.

      There is also the ability to make someone think you are holding a firearm that could cause them harm (easy if the person isn’t infantry qualified), especially during a robbery.

      These people didn’t have them to put them in a shadow box, they had them to appear more dangerous, which can push them into the terrorist designation.

    • xthexder@l.sw0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      If it looks like a real gun, it’s pretty much exactly as effective for commiting crimes as a real unloaded gun. There’s very few legitimate reasons to have a replica firearm and they are highly regulated. Anyone with a criminal record would not be able to get a license for prohibited firearms.