• Bocky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      The internet is free and public. You can go to any mcdonalds and go all the internetting you want. At home, its all the buried cabled that have to be checked on and maintained that you have to pay for.

    • red_pigeon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Won’t they start pulling more and more tax for it then ? Having it private keeps the competition at least, wouldn’t you agree ?

      • henfredemars@infosec.pub
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Your taxes already subsidize it. You just don’t see any benefits for your money in the current system because they pocket it without making upgrades.

      • eating3645@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        ISPs in the US are notorious for getting public funds for services that they never provide, so I wouldn’t be too concerned about that.

      • marx2k@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Ah yes competition. I get to choose between two providers, charter and at&t. Same price, about the same speeds.

      • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        What competition? Tax me and give me fucking municipal fiber instead of giving giant paychecks to wealthy assholes who invest nothing in improving the service but raise everyone’s rates regardless.

      • rusticus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Please tell us how “keeping it private” ensures competition and prevents monopolies. For extra credit, let us know WHO is responsible for preventing monopolies.

        • red_pigeon@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Where did I say it prevents monopolies ?

          Where I’m from if it goes public I’m sure the govt is going to take advantage of it with piss poor speeds. When it’s private, at least there are companies competing with decent speeds even though it’s expensive. It’s a choice between the lesser of two evils.

          • rusticus@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Where I’m from private is slower, more expensive, capped, and throttled. Public is faster, cheaper, unlimited and unregulated. And private lobby’s/bribes politicians to put laws in place preventing public.

  • nevemsenki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s so weird to read these articles. I live in a shithole country, but even here fibre internet with 2.5gbps speeds is easily available… 5G ain’t bad but against it never feels replacing that kind of connection for me.

    • UnityDevice@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      It actually seems common for less developed countries to have better internet than the more developed ones. Germans always complain about their internet, for example. I believe the reason is simply that your country laid down lines relatively recently, so they’re compatible with high speed internet, while Germany laid down their lines 30 years ago, so they’re fairly shitty in comparison. It tends to be a lot harder to convince governments or bosses to replace something that seems to work fine, and it can be costlier too.