Maybe re-read the title

That shit should always be opt in, not opt out.

They were ordered not to disclose findings.

Treating vaping like smoking is wrong, though. They are nothing alike besides containing nicotine.

And you can’t even compare that because the forms of nicotine are different. The one used in modern vapes is only about 12% as bioavailable as the nicotine in tobacco.

Vaping is 95% less harmful, but there’s a gigantic misinformation campaign against it. Most studies that show that vaping produces harmful substances either had methodology that was designed to produce harmful results by using the devices in ways humans wouldn’t, or the scientific reporting on the study grossly misrepresented the findings to make vapes sound scary.

People are confidently incorrect about things all the time.

You’re assumption about their point is grossly mistaken.

No, what I meant was a market crash will affect you even if you have no investments.

The point I was making is that a market crash will affect you even if you don’t have investments

Hopefully that’s a joke

I think it is considering the assertion was they’re never going to change… On an article about them changing.

That defeatism is exactly what the fascists want.

Think for a minute about how providing your ID to access the internet would become a requirement.

That’s the fun part - they don’t! There are no special 1s nor 0s

Yea, it was what was being discussed. Your assertion is that it’s impossible for the ruling class to have an exception. You seem to think a technical limitation exists where none does.

You’re factually incorrect, and show neither an understanding of how networking/websites function, or understanding of how the ultra wealthy and the politicians they buy have a very long history of giving themselves loopholes so the rules don’t apply to them.

Stop moving the goalposts

Yes, it is. The statement was that they would be beholden to the same age verification requirements that we would.

What people have been trying to tell you is that your assumption isn’t backed by precedent.

You do realize that a significant amount of laws that apply to the population don’t apply to politicians and the ultra wealthy, right?

It’s currently one of the biggest societal issues on the planet.

At our grocery store, their self checkout hates me because I apparently scan things too fast.

My school did this 20 years ago. It’s wild that they let kids have their phones in class in the first place.

A system to kill a fuck ton with lasers has existed for decades, but a patent troll is sitting on it.

That’s how most of the world works with regards to filming in public.

This one was on buddy. He gave AI full control over the listing and communications, so of course it gave a buyer the address.