Apologies. I read your comment after an inherently negative one and the negative connotation bled into yours. But yeah, we’re in agreance that the issue is ignoring the need for AI literacy of some sort. The bare minimum is being ignored by upper level decision makers trying to step into the roles they manage. In this case administrators thinking they know better than their best teachers and instead writing the curriculum themselves with LLMs.
Yeah. Of course it’s going to be a problem. Just like any tool that allows people to easily offload work. These people are seeking to bring balance back to their life in a world that’s driven their free time to near zero. They need to be taught how to properly apply the tool, cause sorry to tell ya, the genie is out of the bottle. LLMs are here to stay. So we need to learn to use them appropriately rather than trying to outlaw their use in some way.
Until we get a framework for how to use them appropriately as a society we just need to settle on holding people accountable for blindly trusting their output. At the end of the day, you should be responsible for the work you do. And that includes harmful output and/or outcomes of the AI company itself. If the AI is actively spreading misinformation or harmful content the company and its management should be held liable for damages.
🙄 relying on a common idiom slip to characterize my reliance or sentiment towards AI is pretty lazy, but sure.
Then the issue should be with laziness and poor quality control by the lawmaker. The output of AI is known to have issues. If an issue is found then the repercussions of the output falls squarely on the lawmaker and should be kept in mind during elections or recalls if applicable.
Who cares? As long as the law isn’t inherently flawed or unfair to his/her constituents, I could care less. Its not like lawmakers were previously writing law all by themselves. They offloaded that work to legal teams long ago. So if it was written by AI and manually reviewed by a legal team what’s the difference other than a few seconds of compute to generate the text? Training models and building out unnecessary infrastructure is the primary issue with AI.
I mean, it was assumed and mostly known that it was taking place already. Thats why the government tried to prevent them from being sold in the US. Did anyone really think they were going to give up on spying on world citizens when they were forced to sell TikTok?
This is such a tired take. He gets people enthusiastic about exciting or fun things in tech. Not every tech channel or influencer needs to deep dive analytics or details. Even so, they sometimes do exactly that.
Like him/them or not, they have advanced repairablity, spotlighted unethical behavior, and made useful guides for things like ad-blocking and piracy.
I can’t say that what your take on their Linux videos is wrong, but they had valid concerns and call outs. Their problems are reproducible and are things that would have kept me away from Linux before they were addressed. He genuinely wants Linux to succeed so by bringing attention to problems he had, it helped prioritize friction from switching. Now that he has had much fewer issues with daily driving Linux, he found himself wanting to actively avoid going back to windows. Who knows if that would have been the case if he didnt help spotlight Linux friction points.
I’ve got an extra and don’t know what to do with it. I feel like its bad to pull power unexpectedly once a week though. Especially with a single HDD storage setup. I’d like to setup a RAID config, but its a 28TB drive and additional drives would cost me about $$$$$$$.