Lemmy feature request: Show my negative “karma” in my profile page. You can make it opt-in if you must.

  • 0 Posts
  • 5 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 6th, 2025

help-circle

  • Wow! What an observant smart thought.

    Well, except for the fact that code conversion doesn’t give you the permission to change licenses or remove copyright. And the small matter of fact that both projects mentioned are Canonical projects, where whatever code that is not directly copyrighted by Canonical, is contributed by someone who signed an agreement with this stipulation:

    (b) To the maximum extent permitted by the relevant law, You grant to Us a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, transferable, royalty-free, irrevocable licence under the Copyright covering the Contribution, with the right to sublicense such rights through multiple tiers of sublicensees, to reproduce, modify, display, perform and distribute the Contribution as part of the Material; provided that this license is conditioned upon compliance with Section 2.3.

    “Us” being Canonical of course. So they could actually “re-license” the projects right now, without changing a single line of code.

    It’s always astonishing how condiment in their ignorance people are when it comes to these matters.

    You geniuses are getting too predictable with your ignorance.

    I literally wrote what’s quoted above yesterday replying to someone else.


  • You are in a thread where a user is having a problem because of the push for flatpaks, and because of some distros like Fedora crippling their packages and providing objectively worse alternatives on purpose (because they don’t want to risk RH IBM getting sued). If the user was using some sane community distro like Arch, the user would have never come to realize that such unnecessary issues even exist.

    As for flatpak hate specifically, see my ramblings here.