• r3df0x ✡️✝☪️@7.62x54r.ru
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is not in any way a “threat to public safety” but it’s still a cringe decision.

    The inability to block users actually makes moderation even more necessary and makes it harder to allow “free speech.”

  • Cam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I like this since it forces people who do not like having their world view shaken up to have their world view shaken up. This will either limit echo chambers on the platform or cause people to leave Twitter. Most likely cause people to leave Twitter which I am all for since it is a big tech spyware platform filled with toxic people.

    Nostr is were it is at! Not mastodon.

    BTW I do not have a Twitter account nor do I use Twitter.

    • r3df0x ✡️✝☪️@7.62x54r.ru
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I agree with the sentiment, but it doesn’t hold up in reality.

      Having any sort of engagement with rightoids results in your feed getting filled with Nazi shit.

    • fluxion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You obviously don’t use Twitter if you think well-argued/constructive challenges to worldviews are the sorts of things people need the blocking feature for.

      • Cam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        For some twitter users use the blocking feature to live in a echo chamber. For some it is to block spam. For some it is to block rude people.

        The con of no blocking feature is not able to block spam.