• will_a113@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Every time I read a story about some billionaire getting angry about their private jets being tracked I recall a part of the Kim Stanley Robinson novel Ministry for the Future, a (very) near-future tale about how a few global climate catastrophes wreak such havoc that regular people start taking extreme measures – for example randomly shooting down passenger aircraft for months, causing the collapse of the air travel industry. I have to imagine that the 1%ers are thinking about that too now.

    • keefshape@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      That book is a not-so-covert manifesto, I swear.

      In the book, I noticed upon re-reading – it was always the biggest polluters (usually, the richest of the rich) that had unfortunate drone-strikes while flying.

      Not the electric planes. No commuter planes. Straight up 1%-er targets.

      B admits to it later on in the book, when they hint B might be Mother.

      • SeaJ@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I would say it is an okay book. It’s a little too optimistic on the human side which his books all tend to be. It’s worth a read though of only to give some idea of possibilities.

        • aidan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          “optimistic” just above was talking about how terrorists were shooting planes out of the sky killing people

          • SeaJ@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Everyone has a different definition of optimism. 🙂

            More I meant the final outcome. I don’t think the eco terrorism would be as effective or as coordinated. ELF certainly did not end up changing much in a positive way.

  • _number8_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    private planes, yachts, private chefs, etc seem like such an obscene amount of luxury it shouldn’t be allowed somehow. public services would be better if the wealthy were forced to use them, then they might actually care about the constant shittifying of everything

      • _number8_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        it’s kind of a stretch, yeah, but it just feels so gross, in that same way a yacht or plane does, seeing tiktok vids of someone laboriously crafting this gorgeous, perfect meal for one (1) fucking middle-CEO-partner-twat and his family. if you make enough to afford something like that, get fucked, you definitely don’t work hard enough to deserve it.

        it’s probably a way easier shift for the chef than a restaurant dinner rush, which is great, but it’s just…such an obscenity to think some have access to this sort of luxury because they shook the right hands at the business office / were born into generational wealth.