10 Reasons You Should Switch From Chrome to Firefox.::The best browser sync out there.

  • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    11: It’s the only browser on the market that is not either apple webkit or google chrome based. And it’s in our best interest to keep said market healthy, with as many competing actors as possible.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      At some point there were more than 1 relevant browsers using Gecko, though. Somebody at Mozilla decided to gloriously triumph over allies by killing XULRunner and not offering a replacement.

      Not sure if WebKit is such a bad choice in that context.

      • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        The Tor browser is still Firefox based. Not a large niche, but being THE preferred way to browse with Tor makes it on its own imho

  • thorbot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    10 reasons:

    1. I always used Firefox
    2. I always used Firefox
    3. I always used Firefox
    4. I always used Firefox
    5. I always used Firefox
    6. I always used Firefox
    7. I always used Firefox
    8. I always used Firefox
    9. I always used Firefox
    10. Google can suck my saggy man tits
  • TypicalHog@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Why not Brave? I mean… Firefox is fine, just, some of the extensions I need for example are not available on it.

    • Franklin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Even Brave uses Chromium as a launching point before all of its customizations.

      This in turn gives Google control over web standards because if they choose not to support something or if they implement it in a particular way they effectively govern it’s adoption because of their near universal market share.

      I’m sure I missed a lot of nuance but this is my best take at explaining it.

    • Deebster@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      The article mentions that “Chrome [has a] more restrictive Manifest 3 plugin API”, but doesn’t go into any examples, when this one is the main one (and why Google brought in manifest v3 at all).

  • pathief@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I’ve been moving away from Google in the last year and moving to Firefox was one of my first moves. It’s honestly a downgrade in usability but I guess that applies to all alternative products.

    I just wish I could sync my bookmarks between desktop and mobile. Seems like no one has this problem but firefox sync just does not work for me. It just says last update was never. Let me know if you know how to fix it.

      • pathief@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago
        • Tab Grouping would be my first pick.

        • When I first started using Firefox on Linux, dragging tabs was really reallyyyyyy bad but they have heavily improved it. UI just feels more polished on chrome

        • Sync doesn’t work for me, though it seems to work for everyone else. It doesn’t give me any error or a hint to what the problem might me, which is just bad UX.

        • Chromecasting an entire tab doesn’t work, though I guess can’t we can’t blame Firefox for that, can we?

        • My unit tests take at the very least twice as long to run on Firefox

        • Pinned tabs occasionally just disappear and I have to create everything again. Extensions exist to prevent this but don’t work with multi containers, which is honestly Firefox best feature.

        • ExperimentalGuy@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          What stops you from finding extensions that implement similar functionality? I know tree style tabs are pretty popular instead of tab grouping. This also so the first time I’ve heard of sync or pinned tabs not working. I’m kinda curious ab ur setup if youd be cool with sharing that? I feel like it might be a setup problem instead of a software one.

          • pathief@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Firefox extensions can’t mess with Firefox tabs. Sure you have extensions such as tree style tabs but they don’t really change the tab bar, they add side-panel with your tabs in a tree style format. This means you end up with a tab bar and a tab panel, which is a bit clunky. There are ways to hide the tab bar by messing with the userChrome file but that’s not user friendly at all.

            I don’t have any particular setup that is too outrageous or different from anyone else. I just use Firefox, whatever is the most recent version in the arch repository. Ocasionally I open the browser and I don’t have any pinned tabs, I don’t know why. It’s not a frequent event or something tied to anything I can think off, it just appears to be random.

            The sync problem has been reported here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1879022

              • pathief@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                It still works and is my daily driver! On both mobile and desktop!

                I think it’s extremely important to support Google alternatives and I will continue to do so. Firefox still has pain points and recognizing them is also important.

  • sherlockholmez@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    TAB GROUPS, FIREFOX, BRING BACK TAB GROUPS.

    And no, extensions aren’t helping, their UX is so much worse.

    That’s just a make or break feature for me.

    • jh34ghu43gu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      So I tried to find what tab groups are but most of the results are feature request threads so apologies if this isn’t what you want.

      Waterfox will soon be adding some sort of tab grouping feature akin to what tree-style-tab extension does. Here’s the blogpost about it https://www.waterfox.net/blog/waterfox-x-treestyletab/

      Again I’m not sure if that type of grouping is what you’re looking for but if it is consider watching out for the feature release. Longtime waterfox user and haven’t had many complaints, Alex has quickly responded to the two issues I made in the github including a feature request that got added within a week (ability to unload tabs with right click).